|

Evolution and
Christianity Mix like Oil and Water
Author: Bruce
Malone
Francis Bacon and most of the founders of modern science could not
replace faith in Christ. They realized that without an
acknowledgement of God, the present could not be adequately
explained. Furthermore, these outstanding scientists had confidence
to proceed with scientific inquiry because of their knowledge that
an orderly universe had to have a designer. This trust in the
existence of a personal God, who fashioned an intricate, interwoven
universe, provided the foundation to proceed with scientific
inquiry.
This article is one
of many found within Mr. Malone's excellent book, Search for the
Truth.
Today's intellectuals have lost this foundational understanding of
the purpose of science. The very definition of 'science' has been
altered from "acknowledge truths and laws, especially as
demonstrated by induction, experiment, or observation" (1934 edition
of Webster's New School dictionary) to "knowledge concerning the
physical world and its phenomena"(1983 of Webster's Collegiate
dictionary). This definition removes the idea that "truth" exists
and emphasizes natural phenomena. By this modern definition God's
intervention cannot even be considered because science has been
defined to exclude this possibility.
Truth operates regardless of the opinions of man just as gravity
will operate regardless of belief, understanding, or interpretation.
If the universe and mankind are direct creations of a personally
involved God, then man's interpretations do not diminish the truth
of creation.
The reason that the evidence for creation is not commonly known is
because our public school system has become increasingly dominated
by the philosophy of humanism. The very basis of humanism is that
man, not God, is the center and measure of all things. Evolution
serves as the primary justification for this belief system. Thus
evolution is presented as fact in the public school system and only
evidence supporting this concept is shown to the students. Yet,
evolution stands in sharp opposition to a Biblical world view in the
following way:
1.
The bible states repeatedly that life produces only after its own
kind. This is certainly true as we observe the biological world
around us. Dogs stay dogs, people stay people. Yet evolution
preaches that all life is a blurred continuum.
2.
The God of the Bible demands unselfish sacrifice for the good of
others. ". . . whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your
servant." (Matthew 20:27)
3.
Would this same God use a system of dead ends, extinctions, and
survival of the fittest to make us ?
4.
Belief in evolution justified the excesses of the industrial
revolution, the Nazi elimination of the Jews, and the rise of
Marxism and Communism. It also serves as the justification for the
disbelief in God. Although modern evolutionists try to distance
themselves from the consequences of taking their theory into a
social realm, these historical atrocities are the result of taking
evolutionary philosophy to its logical conclusion. If we are a
product of biological forces why not extend these forces into our
own dealings with other humans? Animal groups do not lament wiping
each other out in order to survive. Why shouldn't we do the same if
we are just part of an evolutionary process that formed us? Creation
is the event that ultimately gives us life value because it links
every human's values to their Creator who loved him enough to die
for him.
There is abundant scientific evidence that macro-evolution has never
taken place. The fossil record shows no credible links between major
groups of plants and animals; the chemical structure of DNA contains
useful information which could not have developed by natural
process; and there is abundant evidence for a worldwide flood which
contradicts evolution. Evolution is a philosophy unsupported by the
majority of scientific observations whose influence has been a
detriment to society and true scientific advancement.
|